1. 01

    Choose the decision first

    Write the choice the meeting needs to inform: improve a page, investigate a handoff, keep a campaign stable, or request more evidence. Bring only the measures that help assess that choice, with enough context to interpret them.

  2. 02

    Use consistent definitions

    Agree on suitable inquiries, duplicates, booked appointments, and completed visits. Note changes in tracking or scope. A month-to-month comparison can be misleading when the underlying definition changed.

  3. 03

    Discuss a plausible explanation

    Separate the observed result from the explanation being considered. Ask what other factors could account for it and what evidence would help. A coherent story is useful, but it should not be presented as proven causation.

  4. 04

    Record the action and revisit it

    Assign an owner, a concrete task, and the evidence needed at the next review. Preserve decisions that recommend no change as well as decisions to act. Repeatedly reopening a settled question wastes the learning already available.

A planning exercise, not a client result

Put the idea to work

Planning exercise: traffic increased but suitable appointments did not. The decision may be to inspect intent and the booking route. It is premature to call the increase a growth result or to redesign every page without identifying the actual gap.

What to watch for

  • A report without a decision
  • Definitions that shift between periods
  • A plausible explanation reported as a fact

Make the next review concrete.

Use the worksheet to record your observations, the evidence behind them, and the decision you want to make. Keep unresolved assumptions visible until they are checked.

Open this site’s worksheet →